Hi,

It is "allways" better for performance to use selection-fields.

The problem is, as you stated, to reorder the content. Before we got the
possibility to set our own integer-values it was also a problem to insert
values.

If you join the two tools ARInside (workflow) with RRR|SelectionChange
(data), you can handle the changes without too much of a problem.
http://arinside.org
https://www.rrr.se/cgi/tools/main#rrrSelectionChange

The only thing that is simpler in selection-fields is to rename something.

If the values are constantly changing (more than once a year or so), I
would suggest that you use something other than selection-values.

        Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se

Products from RRR Scandinavia:
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
* RRR|Translator - Manage and automate your language translations.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

> Hello Listers,
> ARS 7.1
> MS SQL2005
>
> Does anyone have any insight in just when it is best to choose a selection
> field over a character field?
> The character field would have a menu and the display type would be
> Drop-Down List.
>
> I am asking because time and again I get customers would "never" want to
> change the value in the menu/selection field BUT always ask for and
> addition, removal, reorder or change of a value.
> Anymore I am inclined to only use character fields with menus and reserve
> the selection fields for things like "Inactive/Active", "No/Yes",
> "False/True", etc.
>
> Is there a big performance hit using menus? Is it even an issue anymore?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> ---
> John J. Reiser
> Senior Software Development Analyst
> Remedy Administrator/Developer
> Lockheed Martin - MS2
> The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
> Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased by
> me
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
>
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to