We've only used the 701P3 user tool. We have many other date fields on many forms so that is not the common factor. The other core fields did not change length.
I'm assuming you've tried making a new form to see if it does the same thing. Have you 'saved' your existing forms at all since the upgrade? Let us know when you figure it out. Good luck! Susan On 7/31/07, CLG-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Susan, > > We've had Arial defaults for years -- even back when we upgraded to 4.5.2 > (in 2001) and 5.1.2 (in 2003) so it makes no sense to me that this should > be > causing problems like this now. BTW -- we are seeing this behavior with > 7.0.1 P3 user tool. > > So -- did the problem with your 2 fields occur with 7.0.1 P2 or just the > P3 > user tool??? > > Betsy > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Susan Palmer wrote: > > > > Hi Betsy, > > > > We recently upgraded the server from 5.1.2 to 7.0.1P2 and are going > > through > > the user tool upgrades to 701P3. The only fields I've seen a problem > with > > are the Submitted (or Create) and Modified date fields. It's not that > > great > > of movement, goes to the left about 3/8". I never changed from the > > default > > Sans Serif fonts because in the past there were sometimes issues. I > > thought > > it was odd that it was just those two fields, but grateful. > > > > Susan > > > > > > > > > > On 7/30/07, CLG-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello all! > >> > >> We have set up a test environment to check out ARSystem 7.0.1 before > >> upgrading to it from 5.1.2. We have set up a 7.0.1 test server and > have > >> loaded our apps onto it by using a database restore of our 5.1.2system. > >> > >> When we look at fields in the forms using the 7.0.1 Admin Tool, they > are > >> fine but, when we open the forms in the User Tool, the width of all > >> fields > >> in all of our forms shrink by about 20%. (The default font in both > tools > >> is > >> Arial but we don't think this really has anything to do with this > >> problem.) > >> > >> Tech Support is telling us that they have seen this problem before ... > >> they > >> say that even when they corrected the fonts before (whatever that > means), > >> the fields were still messed up and they had to relocate them. > >> > >> Has anybody come across this problem ... and do you have a solution to > >> it? > >> > >> We really appreciate your help -- THANKS MUCH! > >> > >> Betsy McCullough > >> Allergan, Inc. > >> IS - Global Applications Development & Support > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/20--Shrinkage-in-Field-Widths-Using-AR-User-Tool-for-7.0.1-tf4190792.html#a11917733 > >> Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at > >> Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________________________________________ > >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.orgARSlist:"Where > >> the Answers Are" > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where > > the Answers Are" > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/20--Shrinkage-in-Field-Widths-Using-AR-User-Tool-for-7.0.1-tf4190792.html#a11937554 > Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where > the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
