Hello all. As part of NARALO, I attended the ARIN mtg in New Orleans and became aware of the policy re: community networks. I don't have all the details others can contribute. But I have been involved on the policy side with community networks in Canada for 20 years, so can provide a small slice of context from here.

I totally agree that community networks see a lot of value in being recognized in ARIN policy. The few are doing well, others struggle to exist. But they have been and in some areas are still an important part of the Internet access landscape. It is difficult, as it is, to even locate these scattered entities. Deleting language the recognizes their existence would be a shame.

The 100% volunteer driven requirement is not realistic. I don't know what it should be. Even 70% volunteer driven might not bring in much more activity in the short term but it would be a recognition that the non-profit/cooperative model is a viable option for communities trying to manage their own access issues.

Marita Moll

Telecommunities Canada (loose coalition of community networks in Canada)

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to