+1 allocated or assigned was indeed the intent. I believe this is an editorial change.
I would make a call for anyone who either: 1. believes this is not an editorial change 2. would change their decision to no longer support. ___Jason On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to that being a useful editorial change consistent with the policy > intent as I understand it. > > Scott > > On Apr 18, 2017, at 6:54 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Makes sense to me and I'm the penultimate editorial change hater. > > Best, > > -M< > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 21:30 Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > On Apr 18, 2017, at 17:01 , Brett Frankenberger < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 05 April 2017 and decided to >> >> send the following Recommended Draft Policy to Last Call: >> >> >> >> Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-3: Alternative Simplified Criteria >> for >> >> Justifying Small IPv4 Transfers >> >> >> >> 8.5.7 Alternative Additional IPv4 Address Block Criteria >> >> >> >> In lieu of 8.5.5 and 8.5.6, organizations may qualify for additional >> IPv4 >> >> address blocks by demonstrating 80% utilization of their currently >> >> allocated space. If they do so, they qualify to receive one or more >> >> transfers up to the total size of their current ARIN IPv4 address >> holdings, >> >> with a maximum size of /16. >> >> >> >> An organization may qualify via 8.5.7 for a total of a /16 equivalent >> in >> >> any 6 month period. >> > >> > Little late in the game for this, I know, but this language appears >> > ambiguous as to whether or not end-users are permitted to use this >> > policy. "Organizations" is inclusive of end users, but "allocated" (in >> > "allocated space") could be read to exclude organizations that only >> > have assignments. Given the general intent of other 8.x policies to >> > include end users and providers, I would assume that is the intent here >> > (both other 8.x policies generally don't mention allocations without >> > assignments or vice versa). Perhaps "allocated" should be edited to >> > read "allocated or assigned" or something similar. (Or "transferred, >> > allocated, or assigned" to maintain consistency with 8.3 and 8.4.) >> > >> > Maybe it's not an issue; perhaps ARIN could comment as to whether or >> > not, if this policy were implemented as currently written, they would >> > allow end-users to qualify for transfers under 8.5.7. >> > >> > I support this policy if it applies equally to end users and providers. >> > >> > — Brett >> >> I agree that is the intent and I will attempt to get the words “or >> assigned” added >> to the policy before it is recommended to the board. I believe this to be >> an >> appropriate editorial change. Note, I do not speak for the AC in this >> regard, it >> is just my personal opinion and a statement of what I intend to do in the >> upcoming >> AC meeting, nothing more. >> >> Owen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
