Thinking, .....since 2014-21 deals with critical infrastructure, and we are at the ipv4 runout stage that we are at, is it not expeditious for Arin to reserve the new requirement pursuant to the process of implementation in the light of little or no expected challenge to the proposal?
RD On Jan 9, 2015 2:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Send ARIN-PPML mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ARIN-PPML digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 (John Curran) 2. Weekly posting summary for [email protected] (Thomas Narten) 3. Re: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 (Leo Vegoda) 4. Re: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 (Owen DeLong) 5. Re: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 (John Curran) 6. Re: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 (John Curran) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 04:51:22 +0000 From: John Curran <[email protected]> To: Martin J Hannigan <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Dec 25, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll point this list at a public viewable URL to a proper thread there. Not sure why people need to actually subscribe, either way. I also can't force (and won't advocate) people to waste their time like that on either list. > > There are AC members there. They too can report their observations back to the Politburo. I'm sure you'll be well informed. Martin - Insights are welcome from any source, and particularly from those who have operational experience germane to the number resource policy under consideration. If the only goal is having these insights considered during discussion, then having yourself or an AC member bring those points they feel relevant to the PPML discussion should suffice. As I have noted earlier, to the extent that OIX participants wish their support to be included in the discussion summary counts, that will require them to actually participate in the discussion on the Public Policy Mailing List (as per the ARIN Policy Development Process.) Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:53:02 -0500 From: Thomas Narten <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Total of 9 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 9 00:53:02 EST 2015 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 11.11% | 1 | 34.39% | 64279 | [email protected] 11.11% | 1 | 24.43% | 45655 | [email protected] 22.22% | 2 | 6.76% | 12639 | [email protected] 11.11% | 1 | 11.69% | 21854 | [email protected] 11.11% | 1 | 6.83% | 12756 | [email protected] 11.11% | 1 | 6.74% | 12601 | [email protected] 11.11% | 1 | 5.31% | 9926 | [email protected] 11.11% | 1 | 3.85% | 7190 | [email protected] --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 9 |100.00% | 186900 | Total ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:27:17 +0000 From: Leo Vegoda <[email protected]> To: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>, David Farmer <[email protected]> Cc: ARIN-PPML List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 Message-ID: <5daefc653f57495b80f3c616a621d...@pmbx112-w1-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Scott, Scott Leibrand wrote: > How much is ARIN going to get from the next round of IANA returned space > distribution? It's more than a /16, isn't it? If the pool does not change, which could happen if additional space was returned to it, or if additional IETF assignments are made, each RIR should receive a /13. The software used to make the allocations is freely available from github.com/icann. Kind regards, Leo Vegoda -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5475 bytes Desc: not available URL: < http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150109/8249d8a6/attachment-0001.bin > ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 09:31:26 -0800 From: Owen DeLong <[email protected]> To: Leo Vegoda <[email protected]> Cc: ARIN-PPML List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In any case, there is at minimum a /13, right? There?s no possibility for the pool to shrink between now and then if I understand things correctly. Owen > On Jan 9, 2015, at 08:27 , Leo Vegoda <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Scott Leibrand wrote: > >> How much is ARIN going to get from the next round of IANA returned space >> distribution? It's more than a /16, isn't it? > > If the pool does not change, which could happen if additional space was > returned to it, or if additional IETF assignments are made, each RIR should > receive a /13. The software used to make the allocations is freely available > from github.com/icann. > > Kind regards, > > Leo Vegoda > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:53:50 +0000 From: John Curran <[email protected]> To: Leo Vegoda <[email protected]>, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> Cc: ARIN-PPML List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Leo Vegoda <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How much is ARIN going to get from the next round of IANA returned space >> distribution? It's more than a /16, isn't it? > > If the pool does not change, which could happen if additional space was > returned to it, or if additional IETF assignments are made, each RIR should > receive a /13. The software used to make the allocations is freely available > from github.com/icann. Leo - Excellent - it's good to have that estimate for policy development rather than just my recollection! Thanks again! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:00:35 +0000 From: John Curran <[email protected]> To: Owen DeLong <[email protected]> Cc: ARIN-PPML List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Jan 9, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > In any case, there is at minimum a /13, right? There?s no possibility for the pool to shrink > between now and then if I understand things correctly. It is possible for the IETF to make protocol assignments out of the unallocated unicast IPv4 address space. These are generally very small assignments and unlikely to affect any redistribution outcome (but it is a remote possibility.) FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 115, Issue 5 *****************************************
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
