As an ISP planner and operator, the concern is with tying to accommodate exceptions as most of our Transit providers have rules that deny >/24 on their route filters. Yes, exceptions can be made but the administration of those exceptions are somewhat cumbersome to keep track of. Agree that ARIN may not be is a position to block or otherwise stipulate the prefix limit, but will be more of a consensus from the global carriers out there.
Regard, Jose Alvarado Sr Engineering Specialist, | Technology Operations, Internet & Security |Customer Operations | * Tel: 416.642.4036 | *Cell: 416.315.4364| * email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> MTS Allstream Inc [sig8] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Azinger, Marla Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:48 AM To: ARIN PPML ([email protected]) Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-3 Remove 8.2 and 8.3 and 8.4 Minimum IPv4 Block Size Requirements No Support at this time. I have concerns regarding route table growth. However, it might be good to review if some exceptions where appropriate can be made. Although, in the long run operators decide what to route.
<<inline: image001.png>>
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
