The AC abandoned ARIN-2013-6. Anyone dissatisfied with this decision may initiate a petition. The deadline to begin a petition will be five business days after the AC's draft meeting minutes are published.
The minutes of the AC's 11 October 2013 meeting have been published and are available at:
https://www.arin.net/about_us/ac/ac2013_1011.html The deadline to begin a petition is 7 November 2013. For more information on starting and participating in petitions, see PDP Petitions at: https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at: https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) On 10/16/13 3:29 PM, ARIN wrote:
In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) held a meeting on 11 October 2013 and made decisions about several draft policies. The AC moved the following draft policy to last call (it will be posted separately to last call): Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2013-4: RIR Principles The following remains on the AC's docket: Draft Policy ARIN-2013-7: Merge IPv4 ISP and End-User Requirements The AC abandoned the following: Draft Policy ARIN-2013-6: Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors The AC provided the following statement about 2013-6: ##### "The ARIN Advisory Council voted to abandon ARIN-2013-6 "Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors". Based on the community's feedback at the NANOG 59 Public Policy Consultation and ARIN 32 Public Policy Meeting last week, the AC feels that the text proposed is unlikely to ever reach consensus. The AC does believe, however, that the problems 2013-6 tried to address are real, and will look to the community to suggest one or more alternative solutions in the future. Abandonment may permit more clearly addressing each of two important questions that were combined in the proposal. First, there may be benefit from a clearer policy regarding what requirements for an in-region presence are necessary before an allocation is made. The feedback at the meetings indicated that the community did not favor a standard based on a "majority" or "plurality" of in-region customers or infrastructure, and that such a standard might interfere with the legitimate operations of many global businesses or global service providers based within the ARIN region. Second, greater consideration is needed as to whether the perceived need for better verification of the identity of the applicant is an issue that can or should be addressed outside of the number resource policy process, since it may be more properly an aspect of ARIN's business practices. Follow on work may reveal that splitting such issues into multiple policies will permit greater clarity and consensus on these issues from the community." ##### The AC abandoned ARIN-2013-6. Anyone dissatisfied with this decision may initiate a petition. The deadline to begin a petition will be five business days after the AC's draft meeting minutes are published. For more information on starting and participating in petitions, see PDP Petitions at: https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html Draft Policy and Proposal texts are available at: https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at: https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
