On 10/4/13 14:55 , John Curran wrote:
Gary -
Since June 2013, there have been 52 requests that would not have
been approved under the new policy because these organizations
had only some equipment in a data center in the ARIN region, but
either all or most of their technical infrastructure outside of the region
and most or all of their customers outside of the ARIN region.
Total amount of space issued to these 52 organizations: 9,672 /24s,
(which is a bit more than a /11 in total) and nearly all organizations were
based in the APNIC region.
John,
Thank you for the interesting stats, also thanks to Gary for asking the
enlightening question. I assume this is using the "plurality" standard
of the current language of 2013-6. However, there have been a number of
concerns raised regarding the "plurality" standard, including comments
in the staff and legal review.
So, would a "20% minimum" standard be equally effective for the cases
outlined above? For simplicity let's assume, assume "20% minimum", is
substituted for "plurality", as the only change.
Thanks
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
