I wouldnt say that our built system is anything like gentoos. I was making a package and decided to see what the gentoo ebuild had in it. It was totally unreadable.
iphitus On 9/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 17:40 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > >> On 9/20/05, Askadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > "Arch combines the good points of other distributions: the easy > >> configuration from Slackware, the package management from Debian, > >> the build system from Gentoo. The Installation is a lot of work. The > >> reward for your effort is a stable and fast system, which will let > >> you learn much [about linux]." (Please excuse any translation > >> errors. I am not a professional translator.) > >> > >> Hmmm unless it's one of those things that doesn't translate well, > >> "package management from Debian" implies that Arch uses apt-get... > >> same with the Gentoo build system statement... I don't know if it's a > >> translation thing or not... but if it's not a translation issue, it > >> could be fairly misleading. > > > > Well, although it is not stated explicitly, the article meant the > > concept/strengths of Debians package management, not apt-get. The > > paragraph I quoted is the last one, pacman has been already explained > > at that point, so the ambiguity exits only because of the lack of > > context. Sorry for that. > > > > Cheers, > > Bjoern > > > > Uh , no. > > The problem is the use of the word "from" instead of "like" in the > paragraph in question where the comparison is made. > > > Very best regards; > > Bob Finch > > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > -- iphitus - www.iphitus.tk _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
