In data 25.09.2012 08:17:54, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ramana Kumar <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
> What about merging in habs-extra?
There is a combination of reasons for my reluctance to accept new
packages into HABS and [haskell], Fabio points out the main one in
another reply. This means that merging in habs-extra is a BIG deal
and unlikely to happen. I also like to see just how Fabio gets on
with it. We had a discussion earlier where I expressed my doubts
about the idea of splitting up ArchHaskell into several repos. Fabio
pressed on with it, so I'm hoping to at some point be converted and
have my doubts dispelled :-)
I think that the way I wrote made me misunderstood: I do believe that
it should be only one [habs] repository, but with cblrepo many
maintainers could manage a small amount of packages, then simply copy
the resulting Arch package in the main repo. Maintainers should compile
only their package. A script should ensure that everything is in sync.
I wrote a very messy script. I would like to have the time to clean it
before show you with an example what I mean. I should find some time
before the week-end.
Fabio
_______________________________________________
arch-haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
