On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:29:26PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > Thanks for this advice and also Magnus's. > > I've made some progress, and have made a pull request to > archhaskell/habs -- my first contribution to the project! > > But since then I've pulled from archhaskell/habs and have conflicts > in cblrepo.db. What is the best thing to do here -- should I try to > resolve the conflicts on my end (and make another pull request?) or > will Magnus resolve the conflicts (assuming he accepts my pull > request) and I fetch them later?
It's always best to make sure your changes are rebased onto habs/master, that makes it trivial to pull them. > Also, I've noticed that most pull requests are from master to > master. Is this the best way, or is it preferred to make a branch > for any set of packages that we want to contribute? Personally I think this stems from peoples' inexperience with git. It's definitely preferred to make a separate branch for your changes and create a pull request from it. Then use the master branch only to track habs/master. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay
pgpA03VCa1wds.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
