On 12 June 2012 11:53, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Mateusz Loskot <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >> So, here comes my question: >> Considering I'm interested in Hakyll, could anyone recommend where >> should I grab all the related packages and required dependencies from? > > Don't use AUR!
OK, I won't. > Check to see how many of the dependencies are in [haskell], if all are > there: profit! I will try this option tonight. > If only a few are missing you can always raise a bug to > get them added (I look favourable upon existence of patches + > pre-built packages). I'm usually happy to contribute too, though in case of Haskell I'm green as Irish grass. > You also must be willing to accept that future > updates to packages might be delayed due to dependencies of other > packages in [haskell]. Understood. > If all else fails you can always use Cabal. Could you give (or point doc) overview of pros/cons of [haskell] vs Cabal? I understand one of cons is the delayed updates explained above. Thanks! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
