Update works fine now, with haskell-chart 0.14-24; thank you! On 2011-Nov-24, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:30:19PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > I'm getting some errors updating due to inconsistent versions of > > some of the packages listed below -- this started occurring, I > > think, between Nov. 19 and Nov. 21: > > This is due to updates that have been made to [community] three days > ago. I have still not come up with a good way to monitor [extra] and > [community] in an efficient way to be able to catch these events. > > > And if I try re-installing the GTk-related packages as Magnus > > suggested, it's still the same: > > The suggestion to re-install worked fine up until [community] was > updated. > > > By the way, is it planned to have _no_ packages in [haskell] that > > are in [community]? And is it still recommended to have [haskell] > > above [community] in /etc/pacman.conf? > > Yes on the former question. > > Regarding the latter, I continue to have [haskell] above [community] > on my important systems for the simple reason that TUs have a tendency > to just adopt packages into [community] without any sort of > announcement. > > /M > > -- > Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 > email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] > twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus > > > Perl is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then > being a real problem in the longer term. > -- Alan Kay
-- Gregory D. Weber, Ph. D. : Associate Professor of Informatics / \ Indiana University East 0 : Tel. (765) 973-8420; FAX (765) 973-8550 / \ http://mypage.iu.edu/~gdweber/ 1 [] _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
