Le jeu. 7 mars 2024 à 15:15, Ryan Petris <r...@petris.net> a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 6:45 AM, Martin Rys wrote: > > If you had the configuration autoreplaced it would mean you never edited > it - in which case you'd be building packages on a single thread... Surely > not? > > Martin > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 14:41 Ryan Petris <r...@petris.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Robin Candau wrote: > > On 3/7/24 12:34, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi, > Hi, > > > > when I run `makepkg`, it generates a second package with the `-debug` > > "extension" (eg. `mypackage-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst` and > > `mypackage-debug-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst`). > > > > I couldn't find anything about this on the wiki : is this a new feature > > and/or is there a parameter to pass to `makepkg` to avoid building it ? > > > Debug packages have been introduced in Arch in early 2022. > See https://archlinux.org/news/debug-packages-and-debuginfod/ > > regards, lacsaP. > > -- > Regards, > Robin Candau / Antiz > > > > *Attachments:* > > - OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc > - OpenPGP_signature.asc > > > Arch itself may have been generating debug packages since 2022, however > it's only recently that makepkg started spitting out debug packages by > default. The change was made all the way back in June of last year > <https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pacman/-/commit/90bf367e61b4f77f8351d0412be3d0c4ddadb85a>, > but was only included in a pacman release at the beginning of February > <https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pacman/-/tags/6.0.2-9>, > as part of a pkgrel bump. > > This came as a surprise to me as well, when I had -debug packages start > showing up in my personal repository when they had not before, without any > changes made on my end. > > Personally I would have expected some sort of announcement for this > change, though there was none. > > > Prior to needing to modify options, my changes to makepkg consisted of: > > echo 'MAKEFLAGS="-j$(nproc)"' >> /etc/makepkg.conf > > So yes, it's possible. > > On that note, I'm building my packages using standard github actions; I > don't believe those are multi-threaded anyway. > > idem for me. but I build packages very occasionally, so it's not a problem for me (I'll have a coffee in the meantime;-)).
