On 12/1/23 02:24, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi David,

The original version of this email was rejected by the list.
I've contacted postmaster as the bounce suggested.
So I'll keep it brief and include you as a recipient.

You've used ‘enable = true’ but it should be ‘enabled’.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Fail2ban#Enabling_jails

Holy 54it!!

Talk about a forest for the trees issue! Thank you Ralph. That was as bad as FatFS_SPI buried in the middle of a CMakeLists.txt file that should have been FatFs_SPI... I can stare all day and not see the difference and only by picking through the obscure output and .make files do you find it.

With the `enable` instead of `enabled` fail2ban didn't spit out any errors or complain, so there wasn't anything visible pointing me to my screw-up...

 # fail2ban-client status
Status
|- Number of jail:      3
`- Jail list:   dovecot, postfix, sshd

  Thank you, thank you! If I could send a cold-beer via e-mail, it's yours!

--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Reply via email to