Looks like this should be treated as an upstream qwt issue. Thanks for the input!
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:27 PM Erich Eckner <a...@eckner.net> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Peyton Murray wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Hi Peyton, > > > Sorry if this is a naive question, but qwt is currently being built with > > Qt5, which is nearing end-of-life, while Qt6 has been out for a while. > I'd > > like for qwt to be built with Qt6, but I'm not sure if this means the > > package is out-of-date strictly speaking, so I figured I'd ask here > before > > marking the package as such. What's the right way to deal with this? > > Personally, I would rather open a bug for this. Reasons: > > * if there are any obstacles regarding building with Qt6, a bug is more > appropriate to bundle issues, discussions, efforts, ... > > * technically speaking, the package is not outdated (yet) > > * If for whatever reason qt5 got removed from the repositories and the > package still was not rebuilt, it would *definitely* be a bug. > > * If for whatever reason, you're wrong, the maintainer can close your bug > and tell you (and everyone else), what's wrong, in the reason. > > > > > Best, > > - Peyton > > regards, > Erich >
