On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:57:15 +0200 Frank via arch-general <arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
[snip] > #add Perl and Perl modules to file path > export PATH="$(PATH):/usr/bin/core_perl/" > export PATH="$(PATH):/usr/bin/vendor_perl/" > export PATH="$(PATH):/usr/bin/site_perl/" Others have pointed out the syntactic problem here, but I would like to ask about the semantics. I would expect the exact opposite ordering. There doesn't seem any point in specifiying core to override vendor, which overrides site. In what circumstances is that useful? I can understand the other way around where the vendor provides something better than standard perl, or you yourself have installed or written something better than either.
