Em fevereiro 23, 2021 22:48 David C. Rankin via arch-general escreveu:
I understood why it was done, I follow the kernel announcements, etc, but was a bit bewildered by Arch moving LTS to 5.10 before Linux moved to 5.11. Even today, we have: linux 5.10.16.arch1-1 and linux-lts 5.10.17-1 So the LTS kernel is a release ahead of the Arch mainline kernel. It just seemed like as a distro we would want to be a little more coordinated to ensure both linux and linux-lts move in a coordinated way. (sorry for the late reply here, no power for 6 Days 6 Hours due to Texas ice storm... glaring example of all that is wrong with deregulated energy...)
You forgot [testing]. linux-lts became 5.10 after linux became 5.11 on [testing]. The fact that it didn't move to [core] yet is irrelevant. Holding back -lts would not be ideal, just so we could release 5.11 and then move -lts to 5.10. Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp8Q1WtdMclO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
