On 03/06/2017 10:03 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I did not wrote about the NSA. I only pointed out that even the NSA > doesn't get all the data as a gift. Why should a researcher get such > data as a gift? You are seemingly already that used to data mining and > offended privacy, that it's good and natural from your point of view, > if data is misused and any concerns are just crap in your opinion. That > usernames are used in public and maybe even a list might be already > published, is different to actively give the same data away to > "researchers" and to formally allow them to use the data. You seem not > to understand the principle of privacy. If you don't lock the street > door, this does not automatically indicate that you want people to come > into your house and take away your property. Btw. what is the aim of > the research and how could the research be used or possibly misused? We > don't need to care about such questions, if data isn't given away as a > matter of principle.
I also don't think that the list should be published. -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
