Leonid Isaev writes:

> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 05:34:51PM -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> Just expanding on your point.
>
> Ah, OK, sorry :)
>
> Also, perhaps one should note that "walled garden" discussions (albeit
> justified) belong at Mozilla's bug tracker, not Arch's.

Yes, and no.  It should absolutely be brought up there first, but if
Mozilla refuses to budge then it should be discussed here.  It would be
silly to *not* take advantage of the freedoms FLOSS gives us if upstream
is deemed to be heading in the wrong way.

/M

--
Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: mag...@therning.org   jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Finagle's Fourth Law:
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes it
worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to