Re: [arch-general] pacman: List not required and not opt-required.

[Florian Pritz]

On 14.10.2014 09:16, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Are there any plans to add such a flag? Maybe "-tt"? Is there any interest in
> this on behalf of anyone else?

Wrong list, ask on pacman-dev or #archlinux-pacman on irc.freenode.net.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature