On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Paul Gideon Dann <pdgid...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 12 Mar 2014 17:32:27 arnaud gaboury wrote: >> It was UP before I brought vb down. So you have your answer : yes. > > OK, so in that case, I'd recommend not doing anything special on the host to > bring the vb- > dahlia interface up. It's behaving just like a normal interface would on a > real system: the > interface should be brought up and configured as normal in the container; the > host doesn't > need to do anything special. > > So you should have this situation: > > The host has configuration that creates a bridge br0, containing only the > physical interface > enp7s0. The bridge should be given the IP address that you want the host to > have. > > When the container is started, using --network-bridge=br0, the host > automatically creates > the vb-dahlia interface and adds it to the br0 bridge. No additional > configuration is > necessary on the host.
Exactly what it happens > > The container should configure its network exactly as for a normal, > non-virtualised system. > It can use DHCP if necessary, in which case it will receive an IP on the same > network as > the host. Conceptually, they are connected to the same network via a > hub/switch. > Not a bad idea to set up this part in container.
