On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Thomas Bächler <tho...@archlinux.org> wrote: > Am 03.01.2014 15:03, schrieb Øyvind Heggstad: >>> You are suggesting not changing to a sane default because some >>> packages (especially in the AUR) have crappy maintainers. That's >>> hardly a reason for anything. >>> >>> >> >> Your defenition of sane default might not match someone elses. >> >> Many people prefer their box to not slow to a crawl just because they >> started makepkg :) > > Again, we're not changing to a sane default because some people are > unable to use their machines properly? >
Actually, debugging a build that breaks because the build system can't handle -j is really a giant WTF point. I once was there, and after hours into code and logs I found that -j was the issue. Please do not introduce it. Thanks. You can't expect every upstream to fix their autohell to conform to our expectations here. cheers! mar77i
