On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400 Jack Silver <jacksilver...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a > feature request form to ask for a statically builded pacman. > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30993 > > Comments welcome in the bug manager. > > جاك الفضة Well, bugtracker is not a place for comments, it's for solutions. Anyway... statically compiling things is not a way of avoiding trouble, at least not in a self-sustained fashion. So, if you propose to have pacman in [core] statically compiled against all needed libraries, I would be against that as the package will be an unmaintainable mess. That might work for a rescue (read embedded-like system with ulibc) system, but probably booting from a live media is much easier and more robust. -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
