Am 08.05.2012 17:53, schrieb Seblu: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christian Hesse <l...@eworm.de> wrote: >> Any thoughts on that? > I was interested by your suggestion as slim user since 2 years. > Consolekit integration (and my ugly workaround) is my only issue with > it. > > So i took the time to test this light login manager, and my conclusion > is : It's not light. > There are dependencies to gtk3 and qt without any greeter installed. > gtk greater needs gnome-common, kde greater needs kdelibs, so if I > have to use kde or gnome i would look to kdm or gdm instead of a not > so light lightdm. > > I don't think we can compare slim and lightdm ! I tested xdm (with > xdm-arch-theme), it's light and have consolekit integration. > Tobias has just released slim with consolekit integration and it > works great (except for the omission of removing pam ck connector). > > Cheers, > And done removed it from the pam file. Everything should now work and i can only confirm lightdm is not light at all!
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
