On 01/12/2012 05:19 PM, José Ramón García wrote: > On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote: >> >> * 4 known bad packages >> > What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off > report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has > been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.
open a feature request. those packages are not bad in the sense that you will end up with a non booting system or data loses. they have minor issues, like a missing module from kernel -- Ionuț
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
