On 8 September 2011 19:35, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana <dottorblas...@archlinux.us> wrote: > I like the idea, this seems KISS as it is now. > It could be a better way to manage services, kudos!
It could also be incorporated into the rc.d functions, making it elegant to use from within the scripts. The question is, can a few lines of shell code (as has been demonstrated by the bugfix in the bug report above), manage the problem sufficiently? If yes, then a full, separate program to handle this stuff is _not_ KISS. -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10
