dmb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Trying dhcp with the old syntax fails, and configuring a static ip
> appears to succeed, but then fails when I try to do something with the
> connection.
> 
> eth0="eth0 192.168.0.116 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255"
> INTERFACES=(eth0)
> gateway="default gw 192.168.0.1"
> ROUTES=(gateway)
> 
        What does "route" say in this case? I had a similar problem with
the update which was due to the gateway being ignored. At that point
I switched to netcfg which worked fine...

                Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to