On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Thomas S Hatch <thatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >> Anyway, I still see nothing wrong with creating SELinux packages and having >> them available in [community], although I would like to see a separate repo >> at least for the start. >> >> Allan >> >> > If thats the case, then I will look into working with Nicky726 (The > maintainer of the SELinux packages in the AUR) and find a home for a third > party SELinux repo. > > -Thomas S Hatch > User comment, separate SELinux repo would be great. Primarily because Arch repo packages can remain as vanilla as possible =) (nope, not considering SELinux on my home laptop).
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Divan Santana
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Kaiting Chen
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Kaiting Chen
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Nicky726
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Grigorios Bouzakis
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Grigorios Bouzakis
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Thomas S Hatch
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Oon-Ee Ng
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Nicky726
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Thomas S Hatch
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Yaro Kasear
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Thomas S Hatch
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Heiko Baums
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Jeremiah Dodds
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Jelle van der Waa
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Yaro Kasear
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Thomas S Hatch
- Re: [arch-general] base stuff Yaro Kasear