Re: [arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

[Sven-Hendrik Haase]

On 11.11.2010 23:50, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:31 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> Not only this, but also the fact that now there are 2 crons being maintained:
>> fcron in community and dcron in core. Removing dcron to, say, AUR, will be a
>> wiser use of devs' time...
> Bottom-posting please. And I don't see a problem with the current
> situation, one is in [core] the other in [community] (devs vs TUs). It
> could be reverse, if that's what's meant by 'replacing'.
>
> As a result of this thread I've switched to fcron as well. No big deal.
>
>
As far as I am aware, dcron is installed by default and is being advised
as the main crond for Arch on the wiki. By replacing I'd mean making
fcron default in wiki and install.