> > I'd like to go with fcron because it seems to work very well for most > people, has a lot of features while having a small dependency tree. >
I think fcron is kind of heavy for most users. I'd rather we switch to cronie, which is the descendent of vixie-cron. It's developed by RedHat, well maintained, supports PAM and SELinux and can be built with anacron features. Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
