On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 13:24, Nilesh Govindarajan <li...@itech7.com> wrote: > Let this thread not be just another "Will be nice" one. Pacman devs, > please start implementing these package verification things. And you're paying them how much that allows you to tell them what to work on? Seriously, patches welcome.
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Magnus Therning
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Xavier Chantry
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Magnus Therning
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Nilesh Govindarajan
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Chris Allison
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Nilesh Govindarajan
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Jared Casper
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Nilesh Govindarajan
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Daenyth Blank
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Pierre Schmitz
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Ray Kohler
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Ionut Biru
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is sti... Jared Casper
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is still poor..... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is still poor..... Magnus Therning
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is still poor..... Denis Kobozev
- Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux security is still p... Nilesh Govindarajan
