Am Sonntag 15 November 2009 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> James Rayner schrieb:
> > 1. pacman -S core/wpa_actiond
>
> Still testing/wpa_actiond.
>
>
>
>
> About wireless: I don't think the rfkill stuff will work like that. You
> can specify RFKILL_NAME, but that might change over time (it may change
> everytime you unload/load the wireless module and is not guaranteed to
> be persistent). If you don't specify RFKILL_NAME, then it will look into
> /sys/class/net/$INTERFACE/rfkill, which doesn't exist (at least on
> 2.6.32). Using /sys/class/net/$INTERFACE/phy80211/rfkill*/ as rfkill
> path should work though. This needs to be addressed before a final
> release to core.
>
Bug found:
Nov 15 16:37:27 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3327]: Executing
'/etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action eth0 up'.
Nov 15 16:37:27 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3327]: client:
/etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action: line 18: syntax error in conditional expression:
unexpected token `('
Nov 15 16:37:27 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3327]: client:
/etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action: line 18: syntax error near `@(e'
Nov 15 16:37:27 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3327]: client:
/etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action: line 18: ` [[ $CONNECTION != @(ethernet|ethernet-
iproute) ]] && continue'
Nov 15 16:37:27 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3327]: Program execution failed,
return value is 2.and next output: Nov 15 17:13:22 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3743]: Executing '/etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action eth0 up'. Nov 15 17:13:22 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3743]: client: /etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action: Zeile 32: Syntaxfehler beim unerwarteten Wort `if' Nov 15 17:13:22 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3743]: client: /etc/ifplugd/netcfg.action: Zeile 32: ` if check_iface $1; then' Nov 15 17:13:22 Laptop-Carina ifplugd(eth0)[3743]: Program execution failed, return value is 2. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
