Le Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:25:00 +0200, wakeup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I am a vim user but I do agree that nano is the more convenient way for > beginners. Same here. > Besides that, the version of vim installed with base is compiled with a > low fetureset and represents a different package than extra/vim, in my > opinion this is very confusing and unnecessary! I use vim from base (vi), mostly because their buffers don't behave the same way. With vi I can copy and paste using middle click between my laptop and my server through ssh in urxvt out-of-the-box, with vim I have to change some configuration options. And anyway, I don't need the extra bloat added by --with-features=big --with-x=yes. -- catwell
