http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-incompatible_licenses
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:58:20 +0300 > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2008/3/30, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I don't like all these "this version or later" boondongles. > > > Why don't we just keep things KISS and let people explicitly state > what > > > licenses are permissable. GPL1, GPL2, GPL3. Put one, or more of those > > > in your licenses array and it's crystal clear what you mean. > > > > GPL2 "or, at your opinion, any later version" is not the same as GPL2 > > only + GPL3 or later. ;) > > > > Can you explain why they are not the same? I don't quite > understand why that doesn't work. Thanks. > http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-incompatible_licenses
