2008/1/9, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/1/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Right. Let me rephrase that a little. I don't think they need > > explanations that would overflow that box, except for possible URL > > runoff, but that's to be expected > > I think I'm with Karolina here, I remember I had the same impression a > couple of times. It happened, if I want to speed up the upgrade and > save some work to the maintainer, that I'd send a full PKGBUILD. If > the update is non-trivial, that is. >
I have nothing against increasing the size of out-of-date comment box, but in case of large text, PKGBUILDs, even tarballs - send this directly to maintainer by email. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
