Alright, I have updated openssl-1.1 (the one in staging) to the latest
version and both include libprovides now. In addition to this
openssl-1.1 provides openssl=1.1.1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:01 PM Luna Jernberg <droidbit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1.1.1r is just bugfixes and no critical security fix as in the 3.0x series
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:57 PM David Runge <d...@sleepmap.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-11-01 18:27:23 (+0100), Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > > I updated to 3.0.7 in staging. I had libprovides in my branch. Do you
> > > guys think this might be handy to define versioned dependencies when
> > > we have potentially three different openssl verions to maintain?
> > >
> > > provides=('libcrypto.so' 'libssl.so')
> >
> > Always a fan! Please add! :)
> >
> > > At the same time 1.1.1s was released which mainly fixes a regression
> > > from 1.1.1r (we are on 1.1.q). Do you guys think it is worth to
> > > release that 1.1.1 update in the meantime?
> >
> > If it is not critical, maybe better to let the openssl 3 rebuild roll
> > through.
> >
> > Best,
> > David
> >
> > --
> > https://sleepmap.de
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com
