On 2022-07-23 21:24:38 (+0200), Kristian Klausen wrote:
> The load aspect should be solvable, worst-case DevOps gets annoyed ;)
> 
> My main concern is putting ourselves in a position, where we know
> every arch installation, yes it is just the IP addresses, but still.
> At the same time it becomes easier to detect that a computer is
> running arch, by just look at the network traffic (yes you can already
> do that today, by checking if the computer is connecting to a arch
> mirror).
> 
> Maybe I'm blowing it out of proportion, but with our user base being
> more privacy aware than most people, I think it is worth mentioning.

Fair point, however, a similar concern was networkmanager doing a
connectivity check [1].
It is up to us to configure our webserver accordingly and be as privacy
conserving as possible.

E.g. If we wanted to track users (which we don't), we could do so on a
rudimentary basis now already by tracking downloads of packager keys.
The Web Key Directory is a way more centralistic approach than e.g. SKS
was, but we also have better control over how and what we provide there.

Best,
David

[1] 
https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/8bdf9488f2845cad527945898b5cb045a263a073/trunk/PKGBUILD#L121-L125

-- 
https://sleepmap.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to