Em janeiro 29, 2022 9:11 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
Generally my thoughts is that we shouldn't *need* to have a more manhours to deal with a x86_64_v3. We should instead strenghten our staff and work on the following: * Signing enclave * Better rebuilding tools * Build automation * Git migration It would make discussions like these completely obsolete. Do we want v2, v3, v4, v5, v90001? Enable it in a setting and we'd have the repos. It is a lot of work but it would modernize and make things a lot simpler for us.
I wholeheartedly agree that we should improve our automation and our tooling. However, I don't think it should be a blocker for -v3. When we did i686, I simply built the package and I was not able to test it. With -v3, the situation is different, most here can test both packages. The distro as a whole will benefit from this new architecture. We *do* have issues when it comes to the tooling, that's a given. I don't know what else we can do, other than recruiting people interested in helping with it. Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp5O8D9A0gYS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
