Hi, I saw your post; I just did not want to go off-topic right away. :-) At least as long as I am the only contributor I hesitate to give up on how the infrastructure is set up. It seems to be much more complex to do this on "official" servers. I like being able to switch things around outside of just deploying some scripts. E.g. I do automatic deployments, updates, change Web server or database configurations etc..
Greetings, Pierre On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:42 PM Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 15:17, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public > <arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > > > > On 3/14/21 3:07 PM, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > I just updated the server to also accept x86_64 feature levels, ARM > > > and even i686. There is a new version of pkgstats (>= 3.1.0; currently > > > in [testing]) which is able to detect feature levels. ARM support is > > > pretty early, but x86_64 should be fine (using Intel's cpuid library). > > > > > > If you like to check what gets detected on your system run: > > > $ pkgstats submit --dump-json | head > > > system.architecture is your CPU and os.architecture should be the same > > > as "uname -m" > > > > > > Let me know if this does work for you and especially if it does not. > > > Using Qemu for testing is quite limited and I lack old, new and AMD > > > CPUs. > > > > > > An API and UI to analyze these data will follow in the future. (I > > > guess we need to wait a few weeks to see some valid results) > > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > that sounds wonderful, thanks for the work, this will be nice data points :) > > > > Did you see my previous mail? It would be amazing if you can consider > > growing this side-project into something official in terms of being > > available on http://pkgstats.archlinux.org/ > > > > I think this is really a great idea and project that we should advocate > > in the official hosting namespace :) > > > > cheers and thanks, > > Levente > > > > I second this and we've tried to touch on this in the past. I think > "officializing" pkgstats would be neat. > > Cheers, > Sven
