On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 12:18 +0100, Christian Hesse via arch-dev-public wrote: > upstream util-linux replaced the current implementation of hardlink (which we > do not ship) with Debian's [0]. For util-linux 2.37 I plan to package the > hardlink executable and set provides, conflicts and replaces on hardlink > package. Any objections?
Reading last comment on [1] it was expected for 2.35, time flies. I'm happy this finally happen. You could also remove the hardlink packages from [community]. Regards, [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62896 -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
