El Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:18:44 +0000, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public escribió:
> > That's the question. I'm not even sure (but more confident) that we need > libmagick6. I have the complete set ready, but we can still drop the > packages that we later determine are not needed. Last time a tried not a single package that links to libmagick was building with 7, so I'd be surprised if libmagick6 wasn't needed.
