And that error does not show up for me in my dev sandbox, not sure why.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Dan Frankowski <[email protected]> wrote:

> See also
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7799764/google-app-engine-python-2-7-runtime-importerror-cannot-import-name-djangofor
>
> When I try to run my AEP on python 2.7 in production, I get:
>
> ../common/appenginepatch/appenginepatcher/patch.py", line 574, in 
> fix_app_engine_bugs
>     from google.appengine.ext.db import djangoforms
> ImportError: cannot import name djangoforms
>
>
> So, uh, look out, people.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, John Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It looks like there will be some changes to AEP required to support
>> Python 2.7.
>>
>> See here:
>>
>> http://www.allbuttonspressed.com/using-dev_appserver-with-python-2-7-on-app-engine
>>
>> These changes have already been made to Django-nonrel.  Since there
>> are a number of us still using AEP, and there are still missing pieces
>> that will block moving to Django-nonrel, I think it makes sense to
>> update app-engine-patch to support 2.7.  Otherwise, we'll all be
>> updating our local copies independently, and that's closed source
>> thinking.
>>
>> I see several committers besides Waldemar; any committers still
>> monitoring this list?  Otherwise, I see a fork coming.
>>
>> -John
>>
>> On Oct 19, 7:49 pm, johnP <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Porting to Nonrel is great.  But for my production app, the main need
>> > for Django has been the sessions/authentication framework and forms.
>> > Maybe a few utility functions here and there.  Possibly i18n in the
>> > future.  So AEP has been just fine for my needs.  Maybe in the future,
>> > there will be a compelling reason to migrate (needing to host off of
>> > appengine, for example).  I'll cross that bridge in the future, if
>> > necessary.
>> >
>> > But now, there is a compelling reason to migrate to Python 2.7 -
>> > especially with AEP's new billing model.  I have not started the
>> > migration, and will probably do so in December.  In the meantime, I
>> > encourage folks to start sharing experiences about the process for all
>> > of our mutual benefit.
>> >
>> > I don't know if Waldemar still monitors this board.  Do you have any
>> > thoughts about potential python 2.7 pitfalls?  I do understand the
>> > 'migrate to nonrel' message.  But AEP is also a worthy project - even
>> > if it's not bleeding edge at the moment :)
>> >
>> > johnP
>> >
>> > On Oct 19, 8:32 am, dan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > I started to try django-nonrel.
>> >
>> > > My datastore has parent/child relationships, and that is not currently
>> > > supported in django-nonrel.
>> >
>> > > Seehttps://
>> groups.google.com/d/topic/django-non-relational/TkfERTYGtcQ/d...
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "app-engine-patch" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/app-engine-patch?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"app-engine-patch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/app-engine-patch?hl=en.

Reply via email to