2009/12/26 Šimon Payne <[email protected]>: > It would be nice to separate some plugins from this django port (AEP) for > example the media processing modules (ragendja).
You should help with this project, here: http://bitbucket.org/wkornewald/djangotoolbox/ djangotoolbox could only combine the most useful features which make Django a pleasure to use while staying small (for faster instance startups). Why don't you search for all popular Django utilities and see if some of them can be improved and added to djangotoolbox? I'm not thinking of tools like an @json decorator which saves you almost no typing, but rather tools that, for example, make signal handling a no-brainer or maybe ragendja's render_to_response and ragendja's template tags for json generation. The media generator should still be a separate app. Since djangotoolbox should reduce module loads apps don't have the settings and urlsauto features, anymore. This means that the media generator doesn't need to depend on those features, which (if I remember correctly :) was the only thing that prevented the media generator from being separated from aep. Bye, Waldemar Kornewald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "app-engine-patch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/app-engine-patch?hl=en.
