With regards to metalrx features, wouldn't it be better (and in some ways easier) to incorporate them directly into lrx-comp?
I just opened a PR for adding <repeat>: https://github.com/apertium/apertium-lex-tools/pull/32. <def-seq> and <def-macro> would be a bit trickier, but should still be fairly doable. On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 2:05 AM Hèctor Alòs i Font <[email protected]> wrote: > Missatge de Xavi Ivars <[email protected]> del dia dv., 13 de set. > 2019 a les 8:46: > >> El dv., 13 de set. 2019, 12:28, Tino Didriksen <[email protected]> >> va escriure: >> >>> [...] >>> >>> I think only -por-cat uses both metalrx and metalrx-to-lrx, so if you >>> want to merge their functionality it should be harmless enough. >>> >> >> fra-cat (the pair I initially implemented the python script for) also >> uses both. >> >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-fra-cat/blob/master/Makefile.am#L122 >> >> > So do, at least, cat-ita and oci-fra too: > > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cat-ita/blob/master/Makefile.am#L114 > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-oci-fra/blob/master/Makefile.am#L142 > > > >> What I'm not sure is why it seems the python script in there is already >> python3 compatible.... >> -- >> Xavi Ivars >> < http://xavi.ivars.me > >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
