On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 05:54, Jonathan Washington < [email protected]> wrote:
> By "agree on CC-BY-SA", I assume you mean "agree to dual-license the code > as CC-BY-SA in addition to GPLv3+"? > Not really. That would be superfluous because CC-BY-SA can already be used by GPLv3+ projects. But dual-license wouldn't hurt. -- Tino Didriksen
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
