El 2017-06-25 23:22, Xavi Ivars escribió:
Hi!
I'm working with Marc Riera (GSoC student) on apertium-eng-cat, and
we've found some issues with apertium-eng monodix.
There are many entries (directly, or via paradigms) that have comments
regarding dialects, like this one used by encyclopaedia
<pardef n="e_ae">
<e c="en_GB, en_ZA, en_IE, en_CA"><p><l>ae</l><r>ae</r></p></e>
<e c="en_US"><p><l>e</l> <r>ae</r></p></e>
</pardef>
The problem with these entries is that they get analysed properly, but
they don't get generated.
In the next few days, we'll change this to follow Apertium standard's
regarding language variants (v attributes), but we where only planning
to add en_US and en_GB.
Any objection?
Why not do it like in Catalan and make it eng (eng_GB, eng_ZA, eng_CA,
eng_IE, eng_MT, eng_*) and eng_US ? :)
Fran
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
