On 09/29/2016 04:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > - Some talks gave away the speakers name, but most were anonymous. Sometime > the name is important / most of the time it is not. Perhaps best to edit the > occasional name out for the review process? But do you really want to miss > out on say Jim's Apache Way talk because he only put in a one line > description?
Indeed. And as I reviewed, I became aware that I tend to tout my credentials, rather than the value of the talk, in my abstracts. This exercise will forever change the way I write abstracts. -- Rich Bowen - [email protected] - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
