Thanks for your offer to help, reviews should be done by now, and we are in the process of building tracks. The projects/people who offered to build a track, are currently doing so, and these talks will be accepted with just a small check.
We still have many talks that do not belong to dedicated tracks, and we look to group these together so that we have maximum projects represented. I have seen 3 AOO talks during my own review, and I know 1 has been judged accepted by other reviewers. The ACNA is a PITA, I am not happy that it is open in parallel, and it is one of the items I have when we do post mortem ACEU. Just to be clear, we do not "judge" we simply review, and the system adds the score to the talks, so if multiple reviewers select "reject" it is very likely to be rejected, if multiple reviewers select "accept" it will be tried to add it depending on free slots. No need to be sorry, AOO might have benefited from a track builder, that pushed the community for talks. rgds jan i On Monday, July 6, 2015, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/07/2015 jan i wrote: > >> The simple guideline is you choose the talks you have asked people to >> propose, or talks you want in your track. >> You simply order these presentations and give me the order (6 for a full >> tack, 3 for a half track). >> > > My help on this can only be limited to scan all the list and find all > OpenOffice-related talks so that they are grouped somehow and the reviewers > can decide whether to build a track or half-track with those. I can't help > with judging since I may be in conflict of interests. > If this can help, I can do it tonight European time. Otherwise, no problem > and sorry for not being able to do more. Please note that at > http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/cfp-list I only see "ApacheCon Core > North America" submissions, so if you want to use my help here I will need > some additional rights. > > Regards, > Andrea. > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
