On 07/02/2015 12:22 PM, jan i wrote:
On 2 July 2015 at 18:19, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
On 07/02/2015 11:53 AM, jan i wrote:
Hi.
Having been through all presentations for apacheCON CORE, and compared
with
apache big data, I note that about 20 presentations was submitted to both
events.
I also noted about 15-25 (the difference is my lack of specialist
knowledge) presentations
that seems to belong in apache big data.
LF and we, need to be more clear about which kind of presentations are
wanted where.
We also had the usual share of tutorials etc, most speakers have converted
those into
presentations.
Looking forward to see the result from the other reviewers.
It seems that this could be solved with a joint CFP
It could, but that works against the long term goal to have several apache
events, and
not always back to back.
Yeah, so joint CFPs for events that are back to back, which is the only
time that the duplication would really matter.
Maybe it is just a "getting used to" period.
Sure. We'll do a post mortem with Craig and Angela on the other side.
rgds
jan i.
--
Rich Bowen - [email protected] - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
--
Rich Bowen - [email protected] - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
